You are here

Home » Climate Data

Climate Data

FLUXNET: MTE (Multi-Tree Ensemble)

Global, spatially and temporally explicit estimates of carbon and water fluxes derived from empirical up-scaling eddy covariance measurements would constitute a new and possibly powerful data stream to study the variability of the global terrestrial carbon and water cycle. Jung et al (2009)

Key Strengths:

  • Global coverage at spatial resolution comparable to global climate models. Includes uncertainty estimates.

Key Limitations:

  • Upscaling is still hampered by a variety of challenges such as limited ability to account for effects of disturbance and/or site history, and lagged environmental effects (Jung et al. 2011)

Years of Record

1982/01 to 2007/12
temporal metadataID:

Formats

Timestep

Monthly

Domain

Global

Spatial Resolution

0.5x0.5

Ocean or Land

Land Only

Missing Data Flag

missing data present

Vertical Levels

Surface Data Set

Earth system components and main variables

Atmosphere, Latent & sensible heat flux, Land, Gross Primary Production

Data Access: Please Cite data sources, following the data providers' instructions.

  1. Contact PIs

Cite this page

National Center for Atmospheric Research Staff (Eds). Last modified 16 Dec 2013. "The Climate Data Guide: FLUXNET: MTE (Multi-Tree Ensemble)." Retrieved from https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/fluxnet-mte-multi-tree-ensemble.

Acknowledgement of any material taken from this page is appreciated. On behalf of experts who have contributed data, advice, and/or figures, please cite their work as well.

FLUXNET: MTE (Multi-Tree Ensemble)

Global, spatially and temporally explicit estimates of carbon and water fluxes derived from empirical up-scaling eddy covariance measurements would constitute a new and possibly powerful data stream to study the variability of the global terrestrial carbon and water cycle. Jung et al (2009)

1982-01/2007-12

Copyright 2020 UCAR | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Copyright Issues | NCAR Home

The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.