Climate Data

Cloud observations from MODIS

The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) is scanning instrument that makes measurements in 36 spectral bands from the visible to the thermal infrared at spatial resolutions from 250 m to 1 km. There are MODIS instruments aboard two sun-synchronous polar-orbiting NASA satellites: Terra, which has a daytime equatorial crossing at about 10:30 am local time, and Aqua, the primary platform of the “A-train” constellation, which has an equatorial crossing at about 1:30 pm local time. This page discusses cloud observations available from MODIS, and especially a dataset developed especially for the evaluation of global models. An Obs4MIPS version is also available with monthly estimates of total cloud fraction based on the Terra data.

Key Strengths:

  • Global distribution of retrieved cloud optical thickness, particle size, and derived water path
  • MODIS cloud-top pressure estimates for high clouds are more robust than imagers having only infrared window measurements
  • Partly cloudy pixels are excluded in current product version (Collection 5)

Key Limitations:

  • Excluding partly-cloudy pixels complicates comparisons with models and other observations
  • Retrievals can be biased when clouds are broken, inhomogeneous, or contain drizzle (particle size)
  • Limited sampling of diurnal cycle

Expert User Guidance

The following was contributed by Robert Pincus (University of Colorado), December, 2012:

#In individual pixels MODIS reports cloud thermodynamic phase, cloud-top pressure, optical thickness, effective particle size (see Hansen and Travis, 1974)  and, based on the two latter quantities, an estimate of the condensed water path.

MODIS cloud properties are determined in steps. First, the “cloud mask”, with a wide range of situation-dependent tests using measurements in many spectral bands, determines the likelihood that a pixel contains some cloud. Next, cloud-top pressure is estimated, first using a technique based on absorption by carbon dioxide. The so-called CO2 slicing technique fails if the cloud is too low in the atmosphere, in which case MODIS (like ISCCP) uses an estimate based on infrared window emission in a channel centered at about 11 µm. Cloud thermodynamic phase is determined from further spectral tests. Finally, optical thickness and particle size are retrieved simultaneously (Nakajima and King, 1990) by minimizing the differences between observations and forward calculations at two wavelengths (nominally 0.86 or 0.65 µm and 2.1 µm). Liquid or ice water path is estimated from the product of particle size and optical thickness (following Stephens, 1978) but does not represent any additional information.

Like all current global passive remote sensing retrievals, MODIS uses forward models that assume plane-parallel, homogeneous clouds within each pixel. MODIS differs from other datasets (notably ISCCP and MISR) because it attempts to identify and exclude partly-cloud pixels before determining thermodynamic phase, particle size, and optical thickness. In the global, long-term mean “clear-sky restoral” removes about a quarter of all pixels identified by the cloud mask, so that the retrieval cloud fraction (about 50%) is substantially lower than the mask cloud fraction (about 67%, in line with similar estimates). Clouds with low optical thickness (less than ~3) are much less frequent in MODIS observations than in comparable data sets. For more information see Pincus et al. 2012.

MODIS estimates particle size at three independent wavelengths with increasing amounts of absorption by condensed water (1.6 µm, 2.1 µm, and 3.7 µm). Estimates from 2.1 µm are aggregated, but these can be substantially higher than estimates made from measurements at 3.7 µm (doi: Zhang and Platnick, 2011). Estimates from 1.6 µm signals are even higher. This may be due to small-scale variability in cloud properties (Zhang et al., 2012), to the presence of drizzle (Nakajima et al., 2010), or to some combination, but large time-average values of particle size, especially in regions of low cloud fraction, should not be taken literally.

Aggregated MODIS data is available at daily, eight-day, and monthly intervals on a 1-degree equal angle grid. Averages are reported for all clouds and for the subsets of ice and liquid clouds. Linear and logarithmic averages of optical depth are reported (the exponentiated logarithmic average gives roughly the correct mean albedo at cloud-top when coupled with the same surface spectral properties used in the MODIS algorithm). Many joint histograms are provided (optical thickness/cloud top pressure, optical thickness/particle size, etc.)

A MODIS “instrument simulator” is available as part of the COSP package (Bodas-Salcedo et al., 2011, http://cfmip-obs-sim.googlecode.com). Output from this simulator can be directly compared to a subset of the monthly aggregated data described in Pincus et al. 2012.

MODIS cloud fraction estimates from the cloud mask are comparable with ISCCP, MISR, and PATMOS-X, as are optical thickness comparisons that account for clear-sky restoral by MODIS (this can be accomplished in practice by excluding the thinnest clouds from the comparison). Particle size estimates are roughly comparable with PATMOS-X, though this too is complicated by MODIS clear-sky restoral. MODIS estimates of condensed water path are not comparable to microwave estimates except in carefully controlled circumstances (Seethala and Horváth, 2010). ##

Technical Notes

TERRA data are available from NASA for 2000/02 thru present in daily, 8-day and monthly means.

AQUA data are available from NASA for 2002/07 to present in daily, 8-day and monthly means.

The Obs4MIPS version contains only monthly means of total cloud fraction (clt) from TERRA and span 2000/03 to 2011/09.

The Pincus et al. (2012) monthly data are more comprehensive than Obs4MIPS and span 2002/07 to 2011/04.

Years of Record

1999/12 to 2017/03
temporal metadataID:
MOD08_M3_6

Formats

Timestep

Daily | Monthly | Weekly

Data Time Period Extended?

yes, data set is extended

Domain

Spatial Resolution

1°x1° (gridded); 1-4 Km (native)

Ocean or Land

Ocean&Land

Missing Data Flag

missing data present

Vertical Levels

Earth system components and main variables

Suggested Data Citation

original measurements: Platnick, SA, et al., 2003: The MODIS cloud products: Algorithms and examples from Terra. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 41, 459-473. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2002.808301.
gridded products: King MD, et al., 2003: Cloud and aerosol properties, precipitable water, and profiles of temperature and water vapor from MODIS. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 41, 442-458, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2002.808226
simulator-friendly versions: Pincus, R, S Platnick, SA Ackerman, RS Hemler, and RJP Hofmann, 2012: Reconciling simulated and observed views of clouds: MODIS, ISCCP, and the limits of instrument simulators. J. Climate, 25, 4699-4720. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00267.1.

Usage Restrictions

none
  1. Platnick, SA, et al., 2003: The MODIS cloud products: Algorithms and examples from Terra. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 41, 459-473. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2002.808301. (Describes pixel-level retrievals)
  2. Hansen JE and Travis, LD (1974), Light Scattering in Planetary Atmospheres, Space Science Reviews 16, 527-610.
  3. King MD, et al., 2003: Cloud and aerosol properties, precipitable water, and profiles of temperature and water vapor from MODIS. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 41, 442-458.
  4. Pincus, R, S Platnick, SA Ackerman, RS Hemler, and RJP Hofmann, 2012: Reconciling simulated and observed views of clouds: MODIS, ISCCP, and the limits of instrument simulators. J. Climate, 25, 4699-4720. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00267.1.
  5. Nakajima, Teruyuki, Michael D. King, 1990: Determination of the Optical Thickness and Effective Particle Radius of Clouds from Reflected Solar Radiation Measurements. Part I: Theory. J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 1878–1893.
  6. Stephens, G. L., 1978: Radiation Profiles in Extended Water Clouds. II: Parameterization Schemes. J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 2123–2132.
  7. Zhang, Z., and S. Platnick (2011), An assessment of differences between cloud effective particle radius retrievals for marine water clouds from three MODIS spectral bands, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D20215,
  8. Zhang, Z., A. S. Ackerman, G. Feingold, S. Platnick, R. Pincus, and H. Xue (2012), Effects of cloud horizontal inhomogeneity and drizzle on remote sensing of cloud droplet effective radius: Case studies based on large-eddy simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 1
  9. Nakajima, Takashi Y., Kentaroh Suzuki, Graeme L. Stephens, 2010: Droplet Growth in Warm Water Clouds Observed by the A-Train. Part I: Sensitivity Analysis of the MODIS-Derived Cloud Droplet Sizes. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 1884–1896.
  10. Bodas-Salcedo, A., and Coauthors, 2011: COSP: Satellite simulation software for model assessment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 92, 1023–1043.
  11. Seethala, C., and Á. Horváth (2010), Global assessment of AMSR-E and MODIS cloud liquid water path retrievals in warm oceanic clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D13202
  12. King, M. D., S. Platnick, W. P. Menzel, S. A. Ackerman, and P. A. Hubanks (2013): Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Clouds Observed by MODIS onboard the Terra and Aqua Satellites, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. (accepted; pdf preprint linked)
  13. Stubenrauch, C., W. Rossow and S. Kinne (2012), Assessment of Global Cloud Data Sets from Satellites, A Project of the World Climate Research Programme Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment Radiation Panel, WCRP Report No. 23/2012, 176 pp (.pdf).

Key Figures

Click the thumbnails to view larger sizes

Thumbnails

Captions

MODIS joint histogram MODIS-Joint-Histogram: Global-mean joint histogram of cloud optical thickness and cloud-top pressure as observed by MODIS (Terra and Aqua combined). MODIS does not perform retrievals on pixels thought to be partly-cloudy and reports substantially less optically-thin cloud than other sensors. From Pincus et al., 2012. Contributed by R. Pincus.
MODIS cloud fractions MODIS-cloud-fractions: Seasonal cycle of daytime-only liquid and ice cloud amount as observed by MODIS aboard Aqua (2002-2012). These figures show the fractional area for which optical properties are successfully retrieved and so omit pixels thought to be partly-cloudy as well as clouds of indeterminate phase. The sum is therefore less substantially less than other estimates including the MODIS cloud detection algorithm. After King et al. (2013). and contributed by M. King.
MODIS-zonal-cloud-fraction MODIS-zonal-cloud-fraction: Zonal mean daytime cloud fraction over land (red) and ocean (blue) from Terra (2000-2011) and Aqua (2002-2011) for (a) December-February, (b) March-May, (c) June-August, and (d) September-November. From King et al. (2013). Contributed by M. King
MODIS-LinearMean-Optical Thickness MODIS-LinearMean-Optical Thickness: Seasonal cycle of daytime-only liquid and ice cloud optical thickness as observed by MODIS aboard Aqua (2002-2012). Optical thickness is averaged linearly here and so gives a reasonable estimate of water mass but a poor estimate of the radiative effect of clouds for which the logarithmic mean (also available) is preferred. After King et al. (2013). and contributed by M. King.
MODIS Particle sizes MODIS-Particle sizes: Seasonal cycle of daytime-only liquid and ice cloud effective radii as observed by MODIS aboard Aqua (2002-2012). These retrievals use the 2.1 micron band. Pixels thought to be partly-cloudy have been excluded but values, especially in low latitudes; this is thought to be related so small-scale cloud inhomogeneity in liquid clouds and to flawed radiative models for ice clouds. After King et al. (2013). and contributed by M. King.

Cite this page

Pincus, Robert & National Center for Atmospheric Research Staff (Eds). Last modified 02 Jun 2017. "The Climate Data Guide: Cloud observations from MODIS." Retrieved from https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/cloud-observations-modis.

Acknowledgement of any material taken from this page is appreciated. On behalf of experts who have contributed data, advice, and/or figures, please cite their work as well.